From: Competition and microfinance institutions’ performance: evidence from India
lnTC | Coef. | Std. Err. | Z | P > z | [95% Conf. | Interval] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Log of output (lny) | 0.461735 | 0.106461 | 4.34 | 0.000 | 0.253077 | 0.670394 |
Cost of labor(lnw1) | 0.568387 | 0.15546 | 3.66 | 0.000 | 0.263691 | 0.873083 |
Cost ofphysical(lnw2) | 0.772551 | 0.173515 | 4.45 | 0.000 | 0.432469 | 1.112634 |
Cost of fund(lnw3) | −0.34094 | 0.116867 | −2.92 | 0.004 | −0.56999 | − 0.11188 |
(lny)^2 | 0.028881 | 0.006913 | 4.18 | 0.000 | 0.015332 | 0.04243 |
(lnw1)^2 | 0.076606 | 0.020712 | 3.7 | 0.000 | 0.03601 | 0.117201 |
(lnw2)^2 | 0.042823 | 0.021275 | 2.01 | 0.044 | 0.001126 | 0.084521 |
(lnw3w)^2 | 0.018547 | 0.012344 | 1.5 | 0.133 | −0.00565 | 0.042741 |
lnylnw1 | −0.01572 | 0.009599 | −1.64 | 0.102 | −0.03453 | 0.003094 |
lnylnw2 | −0.01727 | 0.009009 | −1.92 | 0.055 | −0.03493 | 0.00039 |
lnylnw3 | 0.032986 | 0.008623 | 3.83 | 0.000 | 0.016085 | 0.049888 |
lnw1lnw2 | 0.009218 | 0.017187 | 0.54 | 0.592 | −0.02447 | 0.042905 |
lnw1lnw3 | −0.0818 | 0.029779 | −2.75 | 0.006 | −0.14016 | −0.02343 |
lnw2lnw3 | 0.072577 | 0.03417 | 2.12 | 0.034 | 0.005604 | 0.13955 |
_cons | 4.822352 | 0.885394 | 5.45 | 0.000 | 3.087012 | 6.557691 |
μ | 0.722708 | 0.272279 | 2.65 | 0.008 | 0.189051 | 1.256364 |
Η | −0.01641 | 0.018225 | −0.9 | 0.368 | −0.05213 | 0.019306 |
ln lnσ2 | −2.28997 | 0.080187 | −28.56 | 0.000 | −2.44714 | − 2.13281 |
ln{γ/(1-γ)} | −0.31352 | 0.208129 | −1.51 | 0.132 | −0.72145 | 0.094402 |
σ2 | 0.101269 | 0.008121 | 0.086541 | 0.118504 | ||
γ | 0.422255 | 0.050774 | 0.327074 | 0.523583 | ||
\( {\sigma}_u^2 \) | 0.042762 | 0.008041 | 0.027002 | 0.058521 | ||
\( {\sigma}_v^2 \) | 0.058508 | 0.0035 | 0.051648 | 0.065368 | ||
Observations | 746 | 746 | 746 | 746 | 746 | 746 |